The Usurpers

Within the Scriptures, there are countless occasions of both the Jews being called the Children of God, [John 10:34-35] and also, the Jews being called Satanic, or the Children of Satan, [John 8:44] and this has caused much confusion as to who the Jews of the Bible truly are. Now for starters, we need to understand that the term Jew in the Scriptures is in fact not a racial term, but a regional term, such as American or Canadian, whereas whatever nationality turns up, seems to get the title American of Canadian whether part of the National Body or not, which in itself is not possible. Now the word Nation is rooted on Nationality, or Nativity, which is a racial term, however, an Aryan in South Africa is considered an African, by location, but obviously not by race. Let us examine the word Jew from the original languages. Strong’s Numbers;

1. 3061 Yhuwd yeh-hood’ (Aramaic) contracted from a form corresponding to 3063; properly, Judah, hence, Judaea:–Jewry, Judah, Judea.
2. 3062 Yhuwda’iy yeh-hoo-daw-ee’ (Aramaic) patrial from 3061; a Jehudaite (or Judaite), i.e. Jew:–Jew.and 3064
3. 3063 Yhuwdah yeh-hoo-daw’ from 3034; celebrated; Jehudah (or Judah), the name of five Israelites; also of the tribe descended from the first, and of its territory:–Judah.
4. 3064 Yhuwdiy yeh-hoo-dee’ patronymically from 3063; a Jehudite (i.e. Judaite or Jew), or descendant of Jehudah (i.e. Judah):–Jew.
5. Greek 2453 Ioudaios ee-oo-dah’-yos from 2448 (in the sense of 2455 as a country); Judaean, i.e. belonging to Jehudah:–Jew(-ess), of Judaea.

Hence we have it from the original languages, as that one is a Jew either by Nationality or by living in the Territory of Judah, or Judea. In particular the Greek, which identifies the people by the name of their location or country, so for Christ to be calling some Jews his sheep, or the Children of Yahweh God, and for Him to be calling others the Children of the Devil, as well as other various allegations, we need to examine Scripture as well as historical reference to see who was in this land, and were they descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, or were they aliens under the name Jew?

Josephus, Wars Book 2, Chapter 8, Section 2

“For there are three philosophical sects among the Jews. [Inhabitants of Judah] The followers of the first of which are the Pharisees; of the second, the Sadducees; and the third sect, which pretends to a severer discipline, are called Essens. These last are Jews by birth, [Nativity, Nationality, the Nation of Judah] and seem to have a greater affection for one another than the other sects have. These Essens reject pleasures as an evil, but esteem continence, and the conquest over our passions, to be virtue.”

So Josephus identifies two of the three sects of the Jews to be Not from the National or Racial Lineage of Judah, and claims that only one of the three sects has any racial claim to this name Judah, keep in mind that Josephus wrote his history in the Greek, and the Greek word for Jew simply and only has a land regional aspect, as pertaining to the inhabitants of this land.

The Catholic Encyclopedia – Idumea

Or the Greek Name for Edom, the Land of the Descendants of Esau

“In early times the Edomites were governed by ‘allûphîm or “dukes”; but during the sojourn of the Hebrews in the desert Mt. Seir was under the control of a king. Gen., xxxvi, 31-39, gives a list of “the kings that ruled in the land of Edom, before the children of Israel had a king”; from this list we gather that the Edomite monarchy was elective. In spite of the blood-relationship uniting Israel and Edom, the two peoples were frequently in conflict. Saul had turned his army against the Edomites (I K., xiv, 47); David conquered and garrisoned the country (II K., viii, 14) and Solomon occupied its ports on the Red Sea (III K., ix, 26). During Joram’s reign, Idumea succeeded in shaking off for a while the yoke of Jerusalem, but Amasias obliged the Edomites once more to own Juda’s sway; finally under Achaz they won their independence. With the fall of Juda into the hands of the Babylonians, whom they [the Edomites] had joined in the fray, the power of the Edomites waxed stronger, and they took possession of all Southern Palestine, making Hebron their capital. But despite their alliance with the Syrians during the Machabean war, they could not withstand the sturdy onslaught of the Israelite patriots who drove them from the south of Juda. The loss of their possessions east of the ‘Arabah, fallen long since into the hands of the Nabathæans, rendered the Edomites an easy prey to their neighbours, and in 109 B.C. they were conquered by John Hyrcanus, who, however, allowed them to remain in the country on the condition that they should adopt Judaism.[1] [This being the Mosaic Laws, not modern Talmudism of the so-called Jews today] When, at the death of Alexandra (69), Aristobulus endeavoured to wrest the crown from his brother Hyrcanus II, Antipater, Governor of Idumea, took the latter’s side in the conflict, and, upon the arrival of the Romans, attached himself closely to them. The assistance he lent to their army in several expeditions, and the services he rendered to Julius Cæsar were rewarded in 47 by the much-coveted title of Roman citizen and the appointment to the procuratorship of Judea, Samaria, and Galilee. His son was Herod the Great.”

[1] Judaism is not the religion of the Old Testament, but is in fact an adopted religion of the Edomites from the Babylonian Religious System, the people of the Old Testament did not practice Judaism as it is known today, but practiced the religion of the Holy Scriptures. Thus, the Catholic Encyclopedia is in error for calling the Religious Order of the Bible, Judaism, and calling the religion of the modern so-called jEws “Judaism” is also an error, because the correct name would be Babylonian Talmudism, and racially, they are Canaanite, Edomite and Khasar, having little to no racial claim to the name Jews, and further being of little to no relation whatsoever to the Israelite Race recorded in the Holy Scriptures.

International Standard Bible Encyclopedia

Idumaea and the Idumeans:

“4. History: The children of Esau are said to have “destroyed” the Horites who dwelt in Seir before them (Gen_14:6; Deu_2:22). This only means that the Horites were subdued. Esau married the daughter of Anah, a Horite (Gen_36:20 –in verse 2 he is called a Hivite); and the lists in this chapter show that the races intermingled. The Horite government was in the hands of “dukes” (Gen_36:29 f.), the Revised Version (British and American) “chiefs”). They were succeeded by dukes of the house of Esau (Gen_36:40 ff.). This form of government gave way to that of an elective monarchy (Gen_36:31 ff.); and this had existed some time before Israel left the wilderness. The then reigning king would not permit Israel to pass through the land (Num_20:14 ff.; Num_21:4). Israel was forbidden to “abhor an Edomite,” on the ground that he was a brother; and children of the third generation might enter the assembly of the Lord (Deu_23:7 f.). War with Edom was out of the question.”

“Some thirty years after the Exodus, Ramses III “smote the people of Seir.” The Israelites could not have been far off. We first hear of war between Israel and Edom under Saul (1Sa_14:47). David prosecuted the war with terrific energy, slaying 18,000 Edomites (so read instead of “Syrians”) in the Valley of Salt (2Sa_8:13 f.) ; Joab remaining for six months in the country, which was garrisoned by Israelites, “until he had cut off every male in Edom” (1Ki_11:15 f.). Hadad of the blood royal of Edom escaped to Egypt, and later became a source of trouble to Solomon (1Ki_11:14 ff., 1Ki_11:25). The conquest of Edom opened to Israel the ports of the Red Sea, whence the expeditions of Solomon and Jehoshaphat set out. In Jehoshaphat’s time the king is called a “deputy” (1Ki_22:47). Its king acknowledged the supremacy of Judah (2Ki_3:9, etc.). Under Jehoram son of Jehoshaphat, Edom revolted. Jehoram defeated them at Zair, but was unable to quell the rebellion (2Ki_8:20 ff.). Amaziah invaded the country, slew 10,000 in the Valley of Salt, and took Sela which he named Joktheel (2Ki_14:7). Uzziah restored the Edomite port of Elath (2Ki_14:22). In the Syrian war Rezin regained Elath for Syria, and cast out the Jews. [Judeans of pure Israelite racial origin] It was then permanently occupied by Syrians–here also probably we should read Edomites (2Ki_16:6). From the cuneiform inscriptions we learn that when Tiglath-pileser subdued Rezin, among the kings from whom he received homage at Damascus was Qaus-malaka of Edom (736 BC). Later Malik-ram paid homage to Sennacherib. To Ezarhaddon also they were compelled to render service. They gave what help they could to Nebuchadnezzar, and exulted in the destruction of Jerusalem, stirring the bitterest indignation in the hearts of the Jews [Judeans of pure Israelite racial origin] (Lam_4:21; Eze_25:12; Eze_35:3 ff.; Oba_1:10 ff.). The Edomites pressed into the now empty lands in the South of Judah. In 300 BC Mt. Seir with its capital Petra fell into the hands of the Nabateans.”

Take notice that the Edomites descended from Esau, and no longer had their own homeland from this point on, and were forced to move into another land, that being Judea, now evacuated by the Babylonian Captivity.

“5. Idumaea and the Idumeans: West of the ‘Arabah the country they occupied came to be known by the Greek name Idumaea, and the people as Idumeans. Hebron, their chief city, was taken by Judas Maccabeus in 165 BC (1 Macc 4:29,61; 5:65). In 126 BC the country was subdued by John Hyrcanus, who compelled the people [Edomites] to become Jews and to submit to circumcision. Antipater, governor of Idumaea, was made procurator of Judea, Samaria and Galilee by Julius Caesar. He paved the way to the throne for his son Herod the Great. With the fall of Judah under the Romans, Idumaea disappears from history.”

“The names of several Edomite deities are known: Hadad, Qaus, Koze, and, possibly, Edom; but of the religion of Edom we are without information. The language differed little from Hebrew.”

Thus we are set up for the understanding that certain people were living in the land of Judah, that were not of the racial lineage of Judah, but further, were they not only residents, but they were incorporated into the religion of the true Judahites. These were the racial descendants of the Patriarch Judah, as recorded by the historian Josephus, whereas the Idumeans or the descendants of Esau were not racially Judahites, but usurped the name Jew by living in the land of Judah. Likewise today, those who call themselves “Jews” are in fact, Edomites, and are not “Chosen Ones”, or “God’s Holy People”, or anything like that, but as will be discussed later, they are in fact damned for their Canaanite mongrelization, and cursed.

Rev 2:9 “I know your works, oppression, and your poverty, and the blasphemy of those who say they are Jews, and they are not, but are a synagogue of Satan.” Words of Christ.

Rev 3:9 “Behold, I give of the synagogue of Satan, of those who say they are Jews, and they are not, but lie. Behold, I will make them to come and worship before your feet, and to know that I have loved you.” Words of Christ.

Esau’s Cursed Existence

Gen 26:34 “When Esau was forty years old, he took as wife Judith, the daughter of Beeri the Hittite, and Basemath, the daughter of Elon the Hittite.”

Of the commandments in the Bible, Racial polution, or race-mixing was forbidden, the Adulteration of the pure bloodline. Now when Canaan was cursed, his heritage settled the land of Canaan, or Palestine, from which they mix-breed with the population, called Canaanites. One reason the Canaanites of Palestine were forbidden was their racial polution, their demonic customs, as well as their rejection by Yahweh God for their sins as well as the sins of their ancestors. The entire racial stock of this land was cursed, and intermarriage with them was forbidden as will be shown in the verses below; you can be assured that all Canaanites are damned, from this first verse listed.

· Zech 14:21 “Yes, every pot in Jerusalem and in Judah will be holy to Yahweh of Hosts; and all those who sacrifice will come and take of them, and cook in them. In that day there will no longer be a Canaanite in the house of Yahweh of Hosts.”

· Gen 9:25 “He said, ‘Cursed be Canaan; A servant of servants will he be to his brothers.’”

· Gen 24:3 “I will make you swear by Yahweh, the God of heaven and the God of the earth, that you shall not take a wife for my son of the daughters of the Canaanites, among whom I live.”

· Gen 24:37 “My master made me swear, saying, ‘You shall not take a wife for my son of the daughters of the Canaanites, in whose land I live.’”

· Gen 28:1 “Isaac called Jacob, blessed him, and commanded him, ‘You shall not take a wife of the daughters of Canaan.’”

· Gen 28:6 “Now Esau saw that Isaac had blessed Jacob and sent him away to Paddan Aram, to take him a wife from there, and that as he blessed him he gave him a charge, saying, ‘You shall not take a wife of the daughters of Canaan,’”

Esau, having commited racial adultery, conceiving mongrel sons and daughters, of the first two of his three wives, had defiled the Holy Seedline of Abraham, with strange women and strange children. Although Yahweh had already announced to Isaac’s wife that Esau would be rejected, and Jacob accepted, Esau’s heritage was from hence polluted, and only from his Ishmaelite wife were any proper seed recognisable, remember, Hagar the Egyptian was also of the Aryan-Adamic Bloodline, being a descendant of Naphtuhim, of Genesis 10:13. From this line were the only possible acceptable seed of Esau that could be married and incorporated into Israel after three generations.

· Deut 23:7-8 “You shall not abhor an Edomite; for he is your brother: you shall not abhor an Egyptian, because you lived as a foreigner in his land. The children of the third generation who are born to them shall enter into the assembly of Yahweh.”

· Zech 14:21b “In that day there will no longer be a Canaanite in the house of Yahweh of Hosts.”

Now the Canaanite was eternally forbidden access into the congregation, so here we have the Edomite~Canaanite connection being drawn from these verses, and further, to understand the law allowing for incorporation of the Edomites, it would be pending that they were free from Canaanite blood, and from the Ishmaelite wife of Esau. All other lineage from Esau would then be unsuitable, and therefore inassimilable.

Judah also made the same Transgression

The two lineages of Judah, and the rejected third

Gen 38:1-30 “It happened at that time, that Judah went down from his brothers, and visited a certain Adullamite, whose name was Hirah. Judah saw there a daughter of a certain Canaanite whose name was Shua. He took her, and went in to her. She conceived, and bore a son; and he named him Er. She conceived again, and bore a son; and she named him Onan. She yet again bore a son, and named him Shelah: and he was at Chezib, when she bore him. Judah took a wife for Er, his firstborn, and her name was Tamar. Er, Judah’s firstborn, was wicked in the sight of Yahweh. Yahweh killed him. Judah said to Onan, “Go in to your brother’s wife, and perform the duty of a husband’s brother to her, and raise up seed to your brother.” Onan knew that the seed wouldn’t be his; and it happened, when he went in to his brother’s wife, that he spilled it on the ground, lest he should give seed to his brother. The thing which he did was evil in the sight of Yahweh, and he killed him also. Then Judah said to Tamar, his daughter-in-law, “Remain a widow in your father’s house, until Shelah, my son, is grown up;” for he said, “Lest he also die, like his brothers.” Tamar went and lived in her father’s house. After many days, Shua’s daughter, the wife of Judah, died. Judah was comforted, and went up to his sheep-shearers to Timnah, he and his friend Hirah, the Adullamite. It was told Tamar, saying, “Behold, your father-in-law is going up to Timnah to shear his sheep.” She took off of her the garments of her widowhood, and covered herself with her veil, and wrapped herself, and sat in the gate of Enaim, which is by the way to Timnah; for she saw that Shelah was grown up, and she wasn’t given to him as a wife. When Judah saw her, he thought that she was a prostitute, for she had covered her face. He turned to her by the way, and said, “Please come, let me come in to you:” for he didn’t know that she was his daughter-in-law. She said, “What will you give me, that you may come in to me?” He said, “I will send you a kid of the goats from the flock.” She said, “Will you give me a pledge, until you send it?” He said, “What pledge will I give you?” She said, “Your signet and your cord, and your staff that is in your hand.” He gave them to her, and came in to her, and she conceived by him.”

Although the lineage of Judah seems strange, from Shelah, the son of Judah and his Canaanite wife, we have a polluted lineage of Judah, but from Tamar, Judah produced two pure seedline descendancies, first of all, Tamar was eligable to produce ofspring by Judah because her husband died, followed by his brother, and she could only conceive seed of Judah [or Shelah if his genetic lineage was pure, which it was not] according to Biblical Law, so she chose her father in law, Judah, and from this lineage came Christ.

“She arose, and went away, and put off her veil from her, and put on the garments of her widowhood. Judah sent the kid of the goats by the hand of his friend, the Adullamite, to receive the pledge from the woman’s hand, but he didn’t find her. Then he asked the men of her place, saying, “Where is the prostitute, that was at Enaim by the road?” They said, “There has been no prostitute here.” He returned to Judah, and said, “I haven’t found her; and also the men of the place said, ‘There has been no prostitute here.'” Judah said, “Let her keep it, lest we be shamed. Behold, I sent this kid, and you haven’t found her.” It happened about three months later, that it was told Judah, saying, “Tamar, your daughter-in-law, has played the prostitute; and moreover, behold, she is with child by prostitution.” Judah said, “Bring her forth, and let her be burnt.” When she was brought forth, she sent to her father-in-law, saying, “By the man, whose these are, I am with child.” She also said, “Please discern whose are these – the signet, and the cords, and the staff.” Judah acknowledged them, and said, “She is more righteous than I, because I didn’t give her to Shelah, my son.” He knew her again no more. It happened in the time of her travail, that behold, twins were in her womb. It happened, when she travailed, that one put out a hand: and the midwife took and tied a scarlet thread on his hand, saying, “This came out first.” It happened, as he drew back his hand, that behold, his brother came out, and she said, “Why have you made a breach for yourself?” Therefore his name was called Perez. Afterward his brother came out, that had the scarlet thread on his hand, and his name was called Zerah.”

From this point on we have three lines of Judah, Perezite and Zerahite, from one came Christ and from the other came the ruling families of Europe, and then there is the other, Shelenite, Canaanite mongrels, descended from Judah. From this early on in scripture, there is already an illegitamate line claiming to be Judah, and this will also help explain why many of those called Jews in the scriptures were rejected, even this far back, and the reason for this rejection is their racial pollution. It would be safe to assume that since Shelah’s mother attempted to wed both of her elder sons into her Canaanite race, that Shelah also returned into the Canaanites, breeding Canaanites who called themselves Judah.

We also find that Simeon had an Illegitamate Child of a Canaanite

· Gen 46:10 The sons of Simeon: Jemuel, Jamin, Ohad, Jachin, Zohar, and Shaul the son of a Canaanite woman.

· Exo 6:15 The sons of Simeon: Jemuel, and Jamin, and Ohad, and Jachin, and Zohar, and Shaul the son of a Canaanite woman; these are the families of Simeon.

Here we have the Two Canaanite Descendancies of Judah and Simeon

1Ch 4:21-43 “The sons of Shelah the son of Judah: Er the father of Lecah, and Laadah the father of Mareshah, and the families of the house of those who worked fine linen, of the house of Ashbea; and Jokim, and the men of Cozeba, and Joash, and Saraph, who had dominion in Moab, and Jashubilehem. The records are ancient. These were the potters, and the inhabitants of Netaim and Gederah: there they lived with the king for his work. The sons of Simeon: Nemuel, and Jamin, Jarib, Zerah, Shaul; Shallum his son, Mibsam his son, Mishma his son. The sons of Mishma: Hammuel his son, Zaccur his son, Shimei his son. Shimei had sixteen sons and six daughters; but his brothers didn’t have many children, neither did all their family multiply like the children of Judah. They lived at Beersheba, and Moladah, and Hazarshual, and at Bilhah, and at Ezem, and at Tolad, and at Bethuel, and at Hormah, and at Ziklag, and at Beth Marcaboth, and Hazar Susim, and at Beth Biri, and at Shaaraim. These were their cities to the reign of David. Their villages were Etam, and Ain, Rimmon, and Tochen, and Ashan, five cities; and all their villages that were round about the same cities, to Baal. These were their habitations, and they have their genealogy.”

From these passages, we find that the House of Israel rejected these mongrel offspring of Judah and Simeon, as we can see by the addition, “To Baal”, “They have their own genealogy”. Likewise, they are reconed as Canaanites, and it states that they lived in the southern regions of Judah, and in the Biblical Greek, the word translated as Jew, is a regional term, so both the pure houses of Judah as well as the mongrel houses of Judah and Simeon would both be called Jews in the New Testament. As we see from before, all Canaanites are cursed, and are not allowed into the congregation. Likewise, all illegitamate descendants of Esau were under the same curse, being Canaanites, who were assimilated into Judah, against Biblical Laws in the Maccabean Period. These also were called Jews in the New Testament because the Greek word for Jew only meant residents of the land region.

The World English Bible

Malachi 1:1-5 “An oracle: the word of Yahweh to Israel by Malachi. “I have loved you,” says Yahweh. Yet you say, “How have you loved us?” “Wasn’t Esau Jacob’s brother?” says Yahweh, “Yet I loved Jacob; but Esau I hated, and made his mountains a desolation, and gave his heritage to the jackals of the wilderness.” Whereas Edom says, “We are beaten down, but we will return and build the waste places;” thus says Yahweh of Hosts, “They shall build, but I will throw down; and men will call them ‘The Wicked Land,’ even the people against whom Yahweh shows wrath forever.” Your eyes will see, and you will say, “Yahweh is great — even beyond the border of Israel!”

Rom 9:13 “Even as it is written, ‘Jacob I loved, but Esau I hated.’”

JohnGill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible

“Rom 9:13 – As it is written,…. In Mal_1:2; Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated. These words are explanative of the former; they are of like import, and the one interpret the other; and show, that the former are to be understood in a spiritual, and not in a temporal sense, and of the persons, and not the posterity of Jacob and Esau; for though Malachi prophesied long after Jacob and Esau were personally dead, yet the Lord in that prophecy manifestly directs the murmuring Jews to the personal regard he had had to Jacob and Esau, and which had continued in numberless instances to their respective posterities, in order to stop their mouths, and reprove their ingratitude; and though he speaks of the nation of the Edomites, and to the posterity of Israel, yet it is evident, that he has a respect to the persons of Jacob and Esau, from whence they sprung, when he says, “was not Esau Jacob’s brother?” Mal_1:2, now though an Edomite may be said to be brother to an Israelite, yet Esau is never said, nor can he with any propriety be said to be the brother of Jacob’s posterity: it remains, that these words regard their persons, and express the true spring and source of the choice of the one, and the rejection of the other; and which holds true of all the instances of either kind: everlasting and unchangeable love is the true cause and spring of the choice of particular persons to eternal salvation; and hatred is the cause of rejection, by which is meant not positive hatred, which can only have for its object sin and sinners, or persons so considered; but negative hatred, which is God’s will, not to give eternal life to some persons; and shows itself by a neglect of them, taking no notice of them, passing them by, when he chose others; so the word “hate” is used for neglect, taking no notice, where positive hatred cannot be thought to take place, in Luk_14:26.”

Jameson, Fausset and Brown Commentary

“Rom 9:10-13 – And not only this; but when Rebecca, &c.–It might be thought that there was a natural reason for preferring the child of Sarah, as being Abraham’s true and first wife, both to the child of Hagar, Sarah’s maid, and to the children of Keturah, his second wife. But there could be no such reason in the case of Rebecca, Isaac’s only wife; for the choice of her son Jacob was the choice of one of two sons by the same mother and of the younger in preference to the elder, and before either of them was born, and consequently before either had done good or evil to be a ground of preference: and all to show that the sole ground of distinction lay in the unconditional choice of God—‘not of works, but of Him that calleth.’”

Mathew Henry’s Concise Commentary

“Rom 9:6-13 – The rejection of the Jews by the gospel dispensation, did not break God’s promise to the patriarchs.

The Jews who were rejected, were in fact not of the tribe of Judah in pure racial lineage, therefore they were exempt from Yahweh’s promise to the forefathers of a blessed and chosen bloodline. Yahweh did not break His covenant, but the ancestors of the race-mixers did, and for their errors, their descendants are cursed, salvation for them is not allowed, and redemption for them is impossible, they are exempt from Yahweh’s promises, and have no right to them, nor any claim to them. In fulfillment with Yahweh’s promise, that in Isaac, His seed would be named, we should look for the chosen race under the name of Isaac, and we find it, Isaac’s-Sons, Sacc’s-Sons, Saxons. Therefore, Yahweh did not break His covenant by the rejection of the so-called “jEws” but was in fact keeping His promice of punnishment through the generations of those who violate His laws. The Chosen Race of Yahweh is the Saxon descendancy, and the tribe of Judah who came from the Perezite and Zerahite descendancy was saved, and today, they are still called Anglo-Saxons, like the rest of Aryan Israel.

The promises and threatenings shall be fulfilled. Grace does not run in the blood; nor are saving benefits always found with outward church privileges. Not only some of Abraham’s seed were chosen, and others not, but God therein wrought according to the counsel of his own will. God foresaw both Esau and Jacob as born in sin, by nature children of wrath even as others. If left to themselves they would have continued in sin through life; but for wise and holy reasons, not made known to us, he purposed to change Jacob’s heart, and to leave Esau to his perverseness. This instance of Esau and Jacob throws light upon the Divine conduct to the fallen race of man. The whole Scripture shows the difference between the professed Christian [Churchians ~ Judeo-Christianians] and the real believer.Outward privileges are bestowed on many who are not the children of God. There is, however, full encouragement to diligent use of the means of grace which God has appointed.”

The People’s New Testament

“Rom 9:10-13 – And not only this. The first argument is that the true seed are children of the promise, [1] a spiritual seed rather than of the flesh. The second argument, now begun, is that God has the right to reject what nation he will, including the Jews, and to choose other races if he will. [2] This is shown by facts from history. He did exercise the right of choice when he chose Jacob as the chosen nation, instead of Esau. The facts are recited to show this.”

· [1] According to Biblical Law, the only way to be the children of the promise is to be of the pure lineage of Israel, with only the occasional exception for others of pure Aryan descendancy, as listed in Genesis 10, to be incorporated through marriage. Notwithstanding this law, negates the promise, and annuls any possibility of the “spiritual seed” promise.

· [2] As a note, as Yahweh stated, only descendants of Israel can be among these races possible for selection, no race can enter without this lineage or purity, and no race can usurp the racial promises of Israel, for any racial claim must be through Israel, or the claim is false and invalid. Yahweh promised in a covenant between Him and Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob that they would be the forefathers of His Chosen Seed, and any other race would be in violation of His own covenant, therefore it is imposible.

“For the children. The children, yet unborn, were both Isaac’s seed according to the flesh; hence, according to the flesh, of the promised seed, and both equally without works, neither having done good nor evil.”

“That the purpose of God according to election might stand. That it might stand forth that he made the choice of his own will, freely. Of his own will he chose Jacob, yet unborn, to become the head of the chosen race, rather than Esau. Note that this election was not to eternal salvation, but to become the head of a people. As Moses, Samuel, and John the Baptist were raised up for a great work of God, so was Jacob.”

“It was said unto her, The elder shall serve the younger. See Gen_25:23. It was said to Rebecca, “Two nations are in thy womb, . . . one people shall be stronger than the other, and the elder (people) shall serve the younger” Esau never served Jacob, but the Edomites, descended from Jacob, served the Israelites. The election here is that of a race.”

“As it is written. In Mal_1:2-3. The language of Malachi, in its connection, shows that this is spoken of the two races. Mal_1:3 says, “I hated Esau and laid waste his mountains and his heritage.” This was not true of Esau as a person, but was true of his descendants. One race was loved and the other race hated. God has then asserted his right to freely choose or to reject races.”

Robertson’s Word Pictures

“Rom 9:13 – Paul quotes Mal_1:2 f. But Esau I hated (ton de Esau emishsa). This language sounds a bit harsh to us. It is possible that the word misew did not always carry the full force of what we mean by “hate.” See Mat_6:24 where these very verbs (misew and agapaw) are contrasted. So also in Luk_14:26 about “hating” (misew) one’s father and mother if coming between one and Christ. So in Joh_12:25 about “hating” one’s life. There is no doubt about God’s preference for Jacob and rejection of Esau, but in spite of Sanday and Headlam one hesitates to read into these words here the intense hatred that has always existed between the descendants of Jacob and of Esau.”

In Conclusion

It is substantially proven here, the Jewish Question once again rears itself, and the true question to be asked is what racial lineage do they come from, are they Shelahite descendants of Judah, or are they Shaulite descendants of Simeon, both Canaanite mongrels, cursed and rejected. Possibly they are Edomite descendants of Esau’s Canaanite Wives of Horite origin? We can be assured that Christ would not say to the same race as himself, that they are both Divine and Satanic;

· John 8:44, “You are of your Father, the devil, and you want to do the desires of your father. He was a murderer from the beginning, and doesn’t stand in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaks a lie, he speaks on his own; for he is a liar, and the father of it.”

· John 10:34-35, “Jesus answered them, “Isn’t it written in your law, ‘I said, you are gods?’ If he called them gods, to whom the word of God came (and the Scripture can’t be broken).”

The answer is simple, as far as the New testament goes, there were two primary factions known as Jews, one mixed from white race, and one racially tainted with negroid blood, and there is no other possible explanation. What was condemned by Yahweh God, cannot be made pure by man, and any attempt to do so is evil, and the Canaanite infused bloodlines of the Edomites, Judahites, and Simeonites cannot in any way be called Israelite. The simple reality is that the so-called “Jews” of today, cannot possibly be Yahweh’s Children;

· John 8:47 “He who is of God hears the words of God. For this cause you don’t hear, because you are not of God.”

· John 8:23 “He said to them, ‘You are from beneath. I am from above. You are of this world. I am not of this world.’”

· John 8:21 “Jesus said therefore again to them, ‘I am going away, and you will seek me, and you will die in your sins. Where I go, you can’t come.’”

· John 10:26-27 “But you don’t believe, because you are not of my sheep, as I told you. My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me.”

Further, If “God’s Chosen People” would hear the Shepherd’s Voice, and follow, where are the so-called “Jews”? After all, they are the ones claiming to be the sheep. It is obvious that they are not, and further, not only are they cursed for the sins of their fathers into bondage of sin, they are rejected, and damned. They are the Usurpers of the Holy Scriptures, a damnable pollution of the Israelite stock, in some cases, more often, not even related to the forefathers of Scripture. Christ Himself explained why these so-called “Jews” reject Him and Christianity, it is because they are “of their Father the Devil”, “Not of God”, “from Beneath”, and “Not His Sheep”. They are the synagogue of satan. Christ made it clear that these people were forbidden and damned, and we need to understand that unless our people reject this modern idea of “judeo-Christianity”, there will be no salvation for the real Israelites locked into this cult. The so-called “Jews” are Usurpers

1 Comment

  1. Jackie2015 says:

    The Edomite jewry infiltrate, then take over and cause chaos to cover their wicked plans. And nothing but wars.

Leave a Reply to Jackie2015 Cancel reply