I was inspired to write this article after watching a presentation by a Negro, that through historical fact and while just teaching truth, was accosted by the Jewish entity called the media, and almost ostracized for daring to teach fact at his College, as a professor. This professor teaches that the jews were predominant in the slave trade, despite their low numbers in population, being the foremost group of people during to and prior to the Trans-Atlantic slave trade. His theory of the cause for such Jewish predominance was their talmudic teachings that the Negro is under the curse of Ham. I have seen this for myself in the talmud, so I will verify in paraphrase form, what the professor’s statement is. The talmud claims that Ham was the progenitor of the Negro race, and when Noah cursed Ham, for “looking upon Noah’s nakedness” the following transformations occurred creating the Negro;
|Ham looked upon Noah in the darkness, so his skin was made dark.|
|Also because of the darkness, the Negro’s eyes were made large and bulging.|
|Ham’s son Canaan was made to be the servant of servants, therefore all “Hamites” [Negroes] were born as slaves.|
This is why the professor states that the jew looked upon the Negro slave trade as a proper and acceptable means of profit, it was from the talmudic excuse that it was the curse of Ham which made them slaves, therefore placing the Hamites where they belonged, under bondage, was perfectly acceptable. I have heard this from the Christian elderly, as well as from some old Klan literature, however this Negro professor was correct in identifying the root of this belief as being talmudic in origin, further jewish in origin. This “jewish fable” contrary to the warnings of the Epistle of Titus somehow crept into the Churches and left their stain. This dissertation is specifically made for the clarification of the fact that the Negro is not Ham, nor Canaan, they are Negroes, having almost nothing to do with scripture, mentioned so seldom, one cannot even make a provable point that they even were mentioned with 100% accuracy. Ham was not the original Negro, neither was Canaan, and here the facts will be set straight.
What Race was Ham
In Genesis 6, we are told that the reason for Noah’s Flood was for the pollution of the race, as we read from the KJV; Genesis 6:4 “There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in to the daughters of men, and they bore children to them: the same became mighty men, who were of old, men of renown.” Further from the NAT; Genesis 6:1-4 “And it came to pass, when Aryans bred and multiplied upon the surface of the higher ground and daughters were begotten, 2 that the rebels of the Heavenly Hosts took for themselves the daughters of Aryans because they were beautiful; and they took their choice of these woman, away from their kind, whomever they selected. 3 And Yahweh said My anger shall no longer be concealed from the Aryans, for they are also accountable for the use of their bodies: I will give them a continuance of one hundred and twenty rotations. 4 There were evil ones on the land at that time, and also the times that followed, when the rebels of the Heavenly Hosts procreated with daughters of Aryans, and they produced offspring to them, these were the tyrants from the beginning, men of infamy.” Now we come to understand that the ideas of “diversity” and “multiculturalism” are satanic, so if Noah was among these people, mixing along, he would not have been saved, for proof we go to Genesis 6:9-10 “This is the story of Noah, Noah was a lawful man, without blemish in his genetic history, and Noah’s conduct was alike that of the Heavenly Hosts. 10 Noah begat three sons, named Sham, Ham and Japheth.”
What can be discerned here is that Noah was a pure bred of the race of Adam, the Hebrew word for Adam meaning, “to blush”, therefore the Negro cannot be from the race of Adam, the race of Adam was the Aryan Race, thus, if Noah is pure in his genetic history, he also is and Aryan. The next point is the question as to how Ham could possibly be black, or Canaan for that matter, simply stated, races do not spontaneously change color, further, a man and a woman cannot have a multiracial family, they could produce mongrels, but not races. Ham was an Aryan was well, therefore, there is no way an Aryan could Patriarch the entire Negro race, in this capacity, the curse of Ham would be upon another race.
What exactly did Ham do Wrong?
For this we go back to the KJV and we will read from Genesis 9:19-27 “These three were the sons of Noah: and from them was the whole earth overspread. And Noah began to be a husbandman, and he planted a vineyard: And he drank the wine, and was drunken, and he was uncovered within his tent. And Ham, the father of Canaan, saw the nakedness of his father, and told his two brethren without. And Shem and Japheth took a garment, and laid it upon both their shoulders, and went backward, and covered the nakedness of their father: and their faces were backward, and they saw not their father’s nakedness. And Noah awoke from his wine, and knew what his younger son had done to him. And he said, Cursed be Canaan, a servant of servants shall he be to his brethren. And he said, Blessed be Yahweh God of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant. God shall enlarge Japheth, and he shall dwell in the tents of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant.”
The Bible is unclear as to the actual sin; the talmud claims that Ham sodomized his father Noah, however other scriptural passages show the contrary,
|Lev 18:6 “None of you shall approach to any that is near of kin to him, to uncover their nakedness: I am Yahweh.”|
|Lev 18:10 “The nakedness of thy son’s daughter, or of thy daughter’s daughter, even their nakedness thou shalt not uncover: for theirs is thy own nakedness.”|
|Lev 18:16 “Thou shalt not uncover the nakedness of thy brother’s wife: it is thy brother’s nakedness.”|
|Lev 20:20 “And if a man shall lie with his uncle’s wife, he hath uncovered his uncle’s nakedness: they shall bear their sin; they shall die childless.”|
|Lev 18:10 “The nakedness of thy son’s daughter, or of thy daughter’s daughter, even their nakedness thou shalt not uncover: for theirs is thy own nakedness.”|
So far, all I can see for the sin of “uncovering someone’s nakedness” is sexual, however all of these items listed are obviously incestuous, not showing anything to do with the sexual disorientation of homo-sexuality, therefore it is clear that Ham did not sodomize Noah, he did something otherwise in a means of sexual defilement, now let us read about “uncovering thy father’s nakedness”;
|Lev 18:8 The nakedness of thy father’s wife shalt thou not uncover: it is thy father’s nakedness.|
|Lev 20:11 And the man that lieth with his father’s wife hath uncovered his father’s nakedness; both of them shall surely be put to death: their blood shall be upon them.|
It is clear here that Ham using the fact that Noah, and probably his wife also, became heavily intoxicated, violated his own mother and conceived a son, a product of incest, this was Canaan. Some will try to say that it clearly states that when Noah woke up he cursed Ham’s son Canaan, so it was the same day, but in Biblical language, that could have been months later, or a curse upon the possible inbred offspring in advance, either way, Canaan was cursed as an inbreed, the product of Ham and his mother. Proof of this can be found all over in the prophecies where the Canaanites are often called “Children of Incest”, they would not have been incestuous if Noah had a second wife, so it was Ham’s own mother that he violated in the night.
Noah was an Aryan, Noah’s wife was an Aryan, or Yahweh would have also let them swim for 10 months like everyone else in the flood. Thus, Ham was an Aryan, and so was Canaan, although of a corrupt conception, having a weakened genome, having been cast aside from the rest of his race he would have had to breed elsewhere. The land of Canaan is modern Palestine; the Canaanites were mongrel offspring of a genetically weak Aryan genome as well as the breed common to this land in antiquity.
What Race did Canaan Become?
We read further in the Holy Scriptures that the offspring of Canaan continued in a downward spiral, starting with their progeny; Genesis 10:15-19 “And Canaan begat Sidon his first-born, and Heth[Hittite-Hethite], And the Jebusite, and the Emorite [Amorite], and the Girgasite, And the Hivite, and the Arkite, and the Sinite, And the Arvadite, and the Zemarite, and the Hamathite: and afterward were the families of the Canaanites dispersed. And the border of the Canaanites was from Sidon, as thou comest to Gerar, to Gaza; as thou goest to Sodom and Gomorrah, and Admah, and Zeboim, even to Lashah.”
Forget the fact that some names disappear; they are the same people as listed below, the same that Yahweh ordered Genocide when encountered.
Deuteronomy 20:16-18 “But of the cities of these people which Yahweh thy God doth give thee for an inheritance, thou shalt save alive nothing that breatheth: But thou shalt utterly destroy them, namely, the Hittites, and the Amorites, the Canaanites, and the Perizzites, the Hivites, and the Jebusites, as Yahweh thy God hath commanded thee: That they may not teach you to do after all their abominations which they have done to their gods; so would ye sin against Yahweh your God.”
The fact that the names are somewhat different, they are the same people, with a few others added that Canaan bred with. Some of these people were of the Kenite lineage, or the mongrel offspring of Cain, so we have now the means to determine the race of the Canaanite. We have some names from Canaan disappearing, because they most likely merged with the original inhabitants of Canaan, erased through breeding, also, since Canaan was banned from the Aryan Race, his offspring would have bred with whatever lived in this land. For this we return earlier in scripture to see who was living there, and there is only one reference, Genesis 4:18-24 “And unto Erech was born Irad: and Irad fathered Mehujael: and Mehujael fathered Methusael: and Methusael fathered Lamech. 19 And Lamech took for himself two wives: the name of the one was Adah, and the name of the other Zillah. 20 And Adah bare Jabal: he was the father of such that live in tents, who deal cattle. 21 And his brother’s name was Jubal: he was the father of all such as handle the harp and organ. 22 And Zillah, she also bare Tubalcain, a fabricator of many wares of brass and iron: and the sister of Tubalcain was Naamah.  23 And Lamech said to his wives, Adah and Zillah, Listen to my voice, women of Lamech, listen to my assertion: for I have killed a man for a wound, and a boy because of a bruise. 24 If Cain is to be avenged sevenfold, then Lamech seventy and sevenfold.” Now read the following footnote;  Naamah is important here, women are rarely mentioned in the Bible, almost never in Genealogies, this name is important because it gives a researcher clues as to the origin of this insert passage, Namaah was a city in Palestine named after this woman, therefore it was probably the origin of this passage, it was probably borrowed as a reference point in scripture, since this information would not have been part of the Aryan knowledge at least until they settled in Shinar, in Genesis 11, but this woman’s name shows a later timeframe, Post conquest of Palestine.
This passage is the genetic lineage of Cain.
Here we have it, Cain’s race was settled in Palestine, so now we need to determine what the race of Cain was, since they also were part of this Canaanite Curse, so we go to the Strong’s Concordance where we find Kenite, the same word as Cain. Hebrew Listing 7014;
קין qayin kah’-yin The same as H7013 (with a play upon the affinity to H7069); Kajin, the name of the first child, also of a place in Palestine, and of an Oriental tribe: – Cain, Kenite (-s).
|The name of Cain, to quote, “Kajin, the name of the first child”|
|Where did Cain’s horde go? We have one of their addresses now, quote, “also of a place in Palestine”|
|What did the Kenites look like? Quote, “and of an Oriental tribe”|
Cain was cast East of Eden into the land of Nod, assumedly Mongolia, so Cain’s wife was an oriental, so the racial pattern of this cursed race of Cain can be assumed to be part Asiatic, Part Aryan and part negroid. Where is the Negro in this? He is the beast of the field (Genesis 1:25 / Pre-Adamites). The Aryans, Asians and Negroids became a mixed breed (Serpent Seed / Jew).
The Cursed Race of Canaan
Now we have to look into the racial picture, we have Aryan Eve, with Satan the father of Cain, whatever race that did represent, most likely satan, being a fallen angel had some White racial characteristics, this is a guess, but the only one we have due to a lack of proof. To begin, we will start with Hybrid Aryan #1, Cain, and add into this Asiatic, and Negroid, thus the very definition of the Kenite is fulfilled. An Aryan, Asiatic Hybrid horde, mixed with beast of the field.
Second, we have Canaan, the Aryan Inbreed settling in this land where the cities are named Cain, and Namaah, a real good means of tracing where some of Cain’s oriental / Negroid sub-race settled, besides Shinar. Now we have 2 Parts Aryan, 1 Part Asiatic, 1 Part Beast of the Field.
¼ Aryan in Pure Form, ¼ Aryan Inbreed, ¼ Asiatic and ¼ Negroid, “Serpent Seed / Jew” what we also know is that Cain was “marked” so he would be protected, this “marking” was the changing of his appearance, or his face. Genesis 4:13-15 “And Cain said to Yahweh, My iniquity is too great to be forgiven.14 I understand that You have driven me out this day from the face of my homeland; and I will be cast off from Your favor, and I will be a fugitive and a vagabond upon this earth; someday, someone will find me and kill me.15 And Yahweh said to him, Therefore whosoever kills Cain, vengeance will be taken on him sevenfold. And Yahweh changed the appearance of Cain, lest any finding him should kill him.” If you look at the Original King James from 1611, the translators knew who Cain was, because in the cross-reference, they write, “Between the Eyes”, that’s the nose.
Back to the beginning, ¼ Aryan Inbreed, ¼ Asiatic and ¼ Aryan from Eve, ¼ serpent, with a strange prominent nose. Gee, I wonder who that might be? Let’s have a closer look at the Canaanites……
The Nose god
This Hittite and Canaanite Deity is one of our favorites, after all, who else would you suppose should be worshiping the “Nose god”. I see pictures of Buddha represented as an oriental or a continental Indian, and I have seen our Messiah represented as an Aryan as he should be, but the point here is that nations usually worship gods and idols that represent themselves, unless they are animals, so we can assume that this Canaanite and Hittite [Heth-ite] “deity” looks like the people that deified their “Holy Presence”
Oy, the Source
This is an ancient drawing of a Canaanite, now please ask yourself, who today has this aardvark like beak, sloped forehead, and an obviously irregular profile. In the past we have labeled certain self professed “Chosen Ones” with this certain Pinocchio like feature as Toucan Schmeuls, Irregular features such as large noses, large ears, chins, or an absence of chins or forehead ridges is usually associated with inbreeding, or the hereditary effects of past inbreeding, for example, when Ham had sex with his mother, Canaan the offspring of incest would carry a weakened genetic code forever. This is a child of Canaan, what the prophets called, “Children of Incest”
These nasally well-endowed persons had a large protrusion, as well as the fold down effect, although the pictures of Hittites have variations from the large straight beak, to the medium through large hooked beak, the fact cannot be denied, the people that most closely resemble these condemned races are today those that call themselves the “Chosen Ones”, you can ask, how can that be? We can all see from the pictures all around here, that modern “Jewry” has these features, in fact it is these very features that separates them from all other races, these features we know associate as “Jewish” are actually evidence that they are mixed breeds of Canaanite Origin, this would also explain why Yahweh has rejected them for salvation, and has “Chosen” them for damnation.
An Ancient “Jew”?
Notice the “Jewish” features again, the recessed chin, the hooked beak, as well as what is called “saucer lip” is all to clear here, and these features are today associated with “Jewry”. This is a Hittite warrior, this is what the race Esau interbred with, looked like, and this is also the race of the Chasers, after all, they once ruled the Babylonian Empire for a small time, and were then driven north into Kazakhstan, as it is known today. Shall we name him Schlomo, Schmeul, Jaime, or Yankl? What we can all call him is a Canaanite hybrid bastard, and he is the ancestor of what today calls themselves “Jewry”.
These are copies of our Blog, “Whatever Happened to the Canaanites”
Where does the Negro fit in?
This is a great question, and here is the great answer, the Negro fits in as a Beast of the Field.
This myth was fabricated and taught by the Jews about the Negro to pass the buck, so to say, from the fact that the curse of Ham, or more correctly, the curse of Canaan is upon themselves. This is why I am so concerned about this myth being taught to Christians and Klansmen, the Negro always claims to have been “wrongfully accused” and a victim of “racist lies”.
It was Jewish racism against the Negro that caused this myth to be passed into Christianity, and it is talmudic in origin, a satanic compilation of the religion from Babylon. The only Negroes involved in the Curse of Canaan are the ones that mix-bred into Jewry.
What Qualifies the Author?
As a Pastor in the Aryan Nations, it is all too clear from facts, both Biblical and archaeological that there is no way that the Negro is possibly Ham, or Canaan. The Negro cannot be Canaan, nor Ham, it is impossible, the Negro by no means possible is derived from the Aryan Race, or the Oriental race for that matter, however, obviously the Jew is, so let us face facts, the Jew best fits the description of Canaan, and sure looks like the Archeological proof of what Canaanites actually looked like, and we can all see, they were not Negroes. How does this qualify the author? There is no qualification necessary, facts are facts, and indisputable, I did not bury Canaanite artifacts 3000+ years ago, and I did not write the Bible, I just study it, and put 1+1 together. Neither did I write the Lexicons, or the Strong’s Concordance that clearly states that the race of Cain was of an Oriental breed. I do not need qualification for this, the facts speak for themselves.
Death to the Canaanites, Death to the Jews!